After years of suing thousands of people for allegedly stealing music via the Internet, the recording industry is set to drop its legal assault as it searches for more effective ways to combat online music piracy.
The decision represents an abrupt shift of strategy for the industry, which has opened legal proceedings against about 35,000 people since 2003. Critics say the legal offensive ultimately did little to stem the tide of illegally downloaded music. And it created a public-relations disaster for the industry, whose lawsuits targeted, among others, several single mothers, a dead person and a 13-year-old girl.
[us album sales]
Instead, the Recording Industry Association of America said it plans to try an approach that relies on the cooperation of Internet-service providers. The trade group said it has hashed out preliminary agreements with major ISPs under which it will send an email to the provider when it finds a provider's customers making music available online for others to take.
Depending on the agreement, the ISP will either forward the note to customers, or alert customers that they appear to be uploading music illegally, and ask them to stop. If the customers continue the file-sharing, they will get one or two more emails, perhaps accompanied by slower service from the provider. Finally, the ISP may cut off their access altogether.
The RIAA said it has agreements in principle with some ISPs, but declined to say which ones. But ISPs, which are increasingly cutting content deals of their own with entertainment companies, may have more incentive to work with the music labels now than in previous years.
The new approach dispenses with one of the most contentious parts of the lawsuit strategy, which involved filing lawsuits requiring ISPs to disclose the identities of file sharers. Under the new strategy, the RIAA would forward its emails to the ISPs without demanding to know the customers' identity.
Though the industry group is reserving the right to sue people who are particularly heavy file sharers, or who ignore repeated warnings, it expects its lawsuits to decline to a trickle. The group stopped filing mass lawsuits early this fall.
It isn't clear that the new strategy will work or how effective the collaboration with the ISPs will be. "There isn't any silver-bullet anti-piracy solution," said Eric Garland, president of BigChampagne LLC, a piracy consulting company.
Mr. Garland said he likes the idea of a solution that works more with consumers. In the years since the RIAA began its mass legal action, "It has become abundantly clear that the carrot is far more important than the stick." Indeed, many in the music industry felt the lawsuits had outlived their usefulness.
"I'd give them credit for stopping what they've already been doing because it's been so destructive," said Brian Toder, who represents a Minnesota mother involved in a high-profile file-sharing case. But his client isn't off the hook. The RIAA said it plans to continue with outstanding lawsuits.
Over the summer, New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began brokering an agreement between the recording industry and the ISPs that would address both sides' piracy concerns. "We wanted to end the litigation," said Steven Cohen, Mr. Cuomo's chief of staff. "It's not helpful."
As the RIAA worked to cut deals with individual ISPs, Mr. Cuomo's office started working on a broader plan under which major ISPs would agree to work to prevent illegal file-sharing.
The RIAA believes the new strategy will reach more people, which itself is a deterrent. "Part of the issue with infringement is for people to be aware that their actions are not anonymous," said Mitch Bainwol, the group's chairman.
Mr. Bainwol said that while he thought the litigation had been effective in some regards, new methods were now available to the industry. "Over the course of five years, the marketplace has changed," he said in an interview. Litigation, he said, was successful in raising the public's awareness that file-sharing is illegal, but now he wants to try a strategy he thinks could prove more successful.
The RIAA says piracy would have been even worse without the lawsuits. Citing data from consulting firm NPD Group Inc., the industry says the percentage of Internet users who download music over the Internet has remained fairly constant, hovering around 19% over the past few years. However, the volume of music files shared over the Internet has grown steadily.
Meanwhile, music sales continue to fall. In 2003, the industry sold 656 million albums. In 2007, the number fell to 500 million CDs and digital albums, plus 844 million paid individual song downloads -- hardly enough to make up the decline in album sales.
Daydream Nation 2011 regarder film
-
Daydream Nation blu ray film complet uhd 2011
Daydream Nation 2011 streaming vostfr online cinema complet
Daydream Nation 2011 vf box office en ligne film ...
1 comment:
It's mind boggling to me that the RIAA is still acting like illegal downloading is the problem. It's not.
The internet is responsible for the slump in sales but not because people are stealing music. In truth, most people don't know how to steal music on the net or they don't have the patience.
The slump in sales is a result of a few things. First, options. Anyone who wants can have their music sold digitally and most music that is commercially available today is being sold digitally. This means that there is a greater amount of product available to the consumer. Distribution used to be the deciding factor in an album's success. People can only buy what is in stores... now everything is in stores online.
Secondly, single song downloading. This is what is killing record sales. People are no longer forced to fork over $18.99 for a crap album with one catchy song on it. Case in point, "I Kissed A Girl" by Katy Perry was one of the most played songs of the year. It was number 1 in 23 countries (including the U.S.A.). You know how many units her album "One Of The Boys" has shifted worldwide? 1.2 million.
Conversely, the single "I Kissed A Girl" has sold over 3 million copies (that's mostly digital) and those numbers are only for the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand.
10 years ago, without iTunes, those wouldn't be single sales, those would be record sales. But people know that she's a terrible artist and only like the song for it's novelty, so they download it for $0.99.
Illegal downloading isn't the problem. The RIAA said the same thing about tape cassettes in the 80's because you could record off the radio. Movie studios said the same thing about VCR's because they can record movies shown on TV.
The truth is, labels can't do what they did for the last 20 years: put together a shit album with one good song and expect to make a profit. If they make an album worth buying, people will buy it. It's already happened with folks like Gnarls Barkley and Fiest.
Post a Comment